LEARNING PROGRESS / FOUR PRACTICAL COURSES

See your learning as clearly as a course syllabus.

Find read guides and saved artifacts by course. The sitewide percentage is reading coverage; choose Agent and local-model branches only when your task needs them.

AI VISTA / PROGRESS FILEOVERVIEW
0%READ
  1. 01Build your first testable AI workflow
  2. 02Make AI answers reliable enough to use
  3. 03Design answers that can show their evidence
  4. 04Automate with permission, recovery, and cost controls
0/ 63 GUIDES READ
COURSE PROGRESSWORKING ARTIFACTSACHIEVEMENT RECORD

LEARNING ROUTE / STAGE 06 · PROGRESS

This stage reconnects the reading log to the work you actually produced.

Reading coverage is an orientation aid that includes optional branches. The useful questions are which artifacts exist, which guide fits next, and which decision still needs testing.

BRING
Read guides, artifacts, and local notes
DO HERE
Review read guides and the next move by course
LEAVE WITH
A progress overview and a clear continuation point
WHEN THIS STAGE IS DONE Return home with the next task Close the loop, then begin again from new real work.

FROM COMPLETION TO WORK EVIDENCE

A complete body of work is not a lesson count. It is four kinds of material another person can review.

Course states help you find your place. The evidence portfolio shows whether learning has reached real work. When one kind is missing, do not restart; return to the matching course and fill the earliest gap.

REVIEW RULEShow the artifacts without a verbal explanation. They count as work evidence only if the reviewer can still identify the decision, support, and failure handling.
  1. 01
    TASK

    Which exact action belongs to AI?

    MATERIAL

    Fit matrix, task brief, control-loop decision, and data boundary

    REVIEW

    Can a colleague identify the input, acceptable output, next-step controller, prohibited action, and handoff owner?

    ↗
  2. 02
    ACCEPTANCE

    What result passes, needs revision, or must be rejected?

    MATERIAL

    Context map, acceptance contract, injection test set, evaluation set, and diagnostic tree

    REVIEW

    When the same cases run again, can failures be classified consistently and traced to a change?

    ↗
  3. 03
    EVIDENCE

    Why should a consequential claim be believed?

    MATERIAL

    RAG decision gate, retrieval trial, and citation-freshness audit

    REVIEW

    Did retrieval find an eligible current passage, and does the citation support the claim?

    ↗
  4. 04
    RECOVERY

    How does failure stop and return to a safe state?

    MATERIAL

    Permission ladder, tool contract, human gates, runbook, cost map, and drift watchboard

    REVIEW

    Can the team rehearse unauthorized, timed-out, duplicated, or rejected actions and choose continue or rollback?

    ↗

COMPLETION IS NOT MASTERY

Use four questions to see whether learning has reached the real work.

A completed state only says you visited the lesson. Real completion needs an artifact, a reviewable standard, current evidence, and a recovery path. A missing answer does not reset progress; it identifies the next place to learn.

HOW TO USEAfter each course, ask someone who did not build the workflow to challenge each row. Record what you cannot answer, then return to the linked topic.
  1. 01
    DOES THE ARTIFACT EXIST?

    Can you open a completed brief, evaluation sheet, permission map, or recovery runbook—not merely recall the guide?

    Pass signal: it uses task-specific field categories, synthetic case IDs, and controlled evidence locations; sensitive originals stay in approved systems.

    Return to the course and make it →
  2. 02
    DID ACCEPTANCE PASS?

    Can a colleague use the same standard and reach the same pass, revise, or reject judgment on the cases?

    Pass signal: the standard separates acceptable, revisable, and rejected work.

    Rebuild acceptance and cases →
  3. 03
    IS THE EVIDENCE STILL VALID?

    Are the sources behind important decisions still current, correctly versioned, and permitted for this user?

    Pass signal: consequential claims trace to valid sources.

    Review source, version, and freshness →
  4. 04
    CAN THE WORKFLOW RECOVER?

    When a model, tool, or handoff fails, who notices, where does it stop, and how does it return to a safe state?

    Pass signal: the team has rehearsed at least one failure.

    Complete the stop and recovery path →

FOUR PRACTICAL COURSES

Continue with the guides that fit your task.

0 / 63 guides read · optional branches included

01
5 lessons · 60–90 minutes

Build your first testable AI workflow

A task brief, control-loop decision, and ten-case pilot sheet.

GUIDES READ0 / 5
Continue next lesson →
02
14 lessons · 2–3 hours

Make AI answers reliable enough to use

A context map, compaction checkpoint, acceptance contract, output protocol check, injection test set, and failure log.

GUIDES READ0 / 14
Continue next lesson →
03
11 lessons · 2–3 hours

Design answers that can show their evidence

A method decision, source admission register, chunking and retrieval trials, access and index checks, a no-evidence response gate, and a citation audit.

GUIDES READ0 / 11
Continue next lesson →
04
37 lessons · Core 3–4 hours; branches vary

Automate with permission, recovery, and cost controls

A control-loop choice, data and permission boundaries, sandbox and tool contracts, runtime stop and human review gates, recovery runbook, service fallback, cost map, and drift watchboard; branch evidence where relevant.

LESSONS & OUTPUTS

Review read guides and saved practice artifacts.